Evaluation Process

The manuscript is examined by the editor for compliance with journal publication principles, academic writing rules and APA 7th edition, and the similarity report obtained via Turnitin is reviewed. The similarity rate must be less than 20%. If the article does not meet the publication principles or is not of the expected quality, it may be rejected by the editor without assigning a reviewer.

The work that passes the field editor's review is submitted for evaluation by two reviewers who are experts in the subject and have at least a doctorate degree. The review process is conducted confidentially in accordance with the double-blind review principle. The field editor ensures mutual communication between the author and the reviewer while maintaining confidentiality. If both reviewer reports are positive, the work is submitted to the Editorial Board with a proposal to evaluate its publication. If one of the two reviewers expresses a negative opinion, the work is sent to a third reviewer. Works can be published with the positive decision of at least two reviewers.

The field editor checks whether the author has made the requested corrections in the article. Then anonymizes the documents sent by the author and sends them to the reviewer.

Articles that pass technical, academic and linguistic reviews are examined by the Editorial Board and the final publication status is decided. In case of objection from members, the Board decides by majority vote.

Articles of the published issue are submitted to indexes within 15 days.